Skip to main content

Autocratic/Democratic Leader

Autocratic/Democratic Leader
One way to explore leadership is in terms of the use of authority by the leader and the amount of freedom given to their direct reports. Clearly, as one increases the other will decrease and this will have a major impact on the way the leader leads. With this in mind, we can recognise two distinct styles of leadership:

Autocratic Leadership – someone who likes to centralise and control. They derive their power from their position of authority and control.
Democratic Leadership – someone who delegates authority, encourages participation and empowers employees. They derive their power from their personal qualities and team members’ respect.
These two leadership styles are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Skilled leaders will blend the use of authority and empowerment of their team to different degrees appropriate to the situation. Some situations, such as an emergency, require quick decision making in an autocratic style. On the other hand, there are times when a more consultative or democratic approach may be better suited, e.g. when reviewing quality initiatives.

Autocratic

Best used in crises where decisions must be made quickly and without dissent.

Incredibly efficient – decisions are made quickly, and work gets done.

 

People resent being treated in this manner. Often leads to high levels of absenteeism and high staff turnover.

Democratic

Most suitable when working in a team is essential and when quality is more important than efficiency or productivity.

Team members have high job satisfaction and are more productive as they are involved in decisions. Staff are engaged and creativity is encouraged.

Decision-making can be slow. Hinders situations where speed or efficiency is essential. Team members may not have expertise to provide high-quality input.

It is important for you to remember that no leader can ever have total authority, since their team members can always ‘vote with their feet’. By the same token, you can never give total freedom since you remain accountable for your team’s actions

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Helping is not Helping

Having the desire to help others is the calling that brings many into the “helping professions.” For others, it is the day to day service that we do for our families, children and others we work for/or/with. There is a fine line however when helping is not really helping, but rather a barrier that leads to stagnation or worse yet, fosters an unhealthy dependence. Indicators of when helping is NOT helping: 1. When the help we provide is not accepted by others The term I’ve used for years is when helping leads to “help rejecting complainers.” When our helping leads others to excuse themselves of embracing the help, then rejecting it, or avoiding it. This is not a judgment of our help or our intent, but of others’ readiness to change. They may simply not see the same way as you do. They may not value the same things. 2. When the help leads others to make the same poor decisions Any change effort has to be embraced as well as given. It is hard to un...

WHERE SHALL WE GO?

When we can no longer differentiate a church from a social gathering, and all what we do in church is to just have fun. When we can’t differentiate a choir from a harlot, and an usher is not different from a waiter. When the church is no more conducive where shall we go? When worship session in a church is just like a disco night and we cant differentiate a pastor from a comedian. When salvation message is no longer the order of the day but prosperity and entertainment message is now the core course. When the church is no more conducive where shall we go? When prayer warrior now have to go to tongue- speaking school for utterances, and deliverance and healing session is now like MTH 201 to be taught and learned. When pastor have to pause for members to clap and shout during sermon in enthusiasm, and all what we now gain from preaching is now new vocabulary and word usage. When the church is no more conducive where shall we go? When the church of God is now...

The Most complex problem

Many hundreds of years ago in a small Italian town, a merchant had the misfortune of owing a large sum of money to the moneylender. The moneylender, who was old and ugly, fancied the merchant’s beautiful daughter so he proposed a bargain. He said he would forgo the merchant’s debt if he could marry the daughter. Both the merchant and his daughter were horrified by the proposal. The moneylender told them that he would put a black pebble and a white pebble into an empty bag. The girl would then have to pick one pebble from the bag.If she picked the black pebble, she would become the moneylender’s wife and her father’s debt would be forgiven. If she picked the white pebble she need not marry him and her father’s debt would still be forgiven. But if she refused to pick a pebble, her father would be thrown into jail. They were standing on a pebble strewn path in the merchant’s garden. As they talked, the moneylender bent over to pick up ...